@mauve this is kind of eternal-september-ish, but more about the scale of a community than the influx of newcomers
@yhancik Oh? tell me more.
@yhancik yeah, I get that. It's complicated. IMO this is one of the issues with centralized spaces. IMO it'd be nice if the onboarding was more organic based on attaching onto social connections that are established off platform rather than getting exposed to large volumes of low context info.
@mauve as someone who started online in the early 2000s: we had (semi)centralised spaces and connections born on-platform. But thinking of something like Livejournal, you didn't have a global timeline exposing you to everything anyone was posting.
In other places (thinking of Deviantart) where you had that exposure, the context was still present because the community was small (to today's standards) and very focused. I guess the same would apply to forums of the time.
First social networks I saw (Friendster, Orkut, MySpace) were weird to me because they didn't seem to have a point. No focus like "this is a community about a topic" or "this is place to blog", but just "this is a place to have a profile and friend other profiles".
A nice thing about the Fediverse is that it brings back, in some places, this "topical community" thing with servers, and a nice middle ground between small (server) and wide (fediverse)