I'm yet again reminded that accessibility technologies are priced unfairly. Did you know that a pair of hearing aids starts at roughly £500 but an average model can easily cost over £1500? And it's not like it's rocket science.
Similarly, Braille displays start at £1500, but can easily cost over £5000.
Similarly, the most popular and one of the most affordable Braille printers costs almost £3000.
Something can be said about special design requirements for such devices, or about the fact that there is no demand to make them at the scale that would allow to cut the costs ten times. And I can't even say that a high price is an excuse; if you'd try to build a Braille embosser that can operate at practical speeds with decent reliability using off the shelf components, you are likely to spend more money on it than you'd spend getting a commercial solution, even without R&D costs.
So, uh, folks, we can do better. I can't be the only one who keeps thinking about making such technologies cheaper, right?
And of course on a SiliconGraphics workstation there's also a 3D gopher client: GopherVR
Found it from this blog post on using orca headless on a raspberry pi. I want to get rid of screens eventually so it's quite relevant for me.
https://techesoterica.com/future-ready-vision-with-the-voice-and-the-raspberry-pi-4b/
Stumbled across this neat tool for #blind folks to use webcams as a sort of sonar using stereo audio. (warning can be loud)
Occult Enby that's making local-first software with peer to peer protocols, mesh networks, and the web.
Yap with me and send me cool links relating to my interests. 👍