@vv can't belive "us" isn't an option. Disregarding the zoomer demographic
Social network UI musings
@greytheearthling Yeah IMO this is why ActivityPub should have a standard for querying data in your inbox simar to Triple Pattern Fragments or even SPARQL. Then this stuff can be done on the client instead of the server.
One thing I like about chronological timelines is I have no clue who I follow is "an influencer" or a random shitposter. A person with 100 followers is just as visible as 100 thousand.
on algo based media it's just mostly cool kida that get shoved in people's faces and I guess into each others faces.
Talking to a friend today who works at a BigCo that uses TypeScript. Personally, I think TS is a tax on developers’ time and attention. They mentioned they were initially unproductive with TS, but it's smooth sailing now. I responded, “Yes, but you work at a big company, you can have dedicated TS teams.”
Their response:
Now libraries are getting hit in Canada:
"She said the 'book banning people' have attended almost all board meetings since trustees voted down the review."
"...the recent scale and tone of these recent challenges mimics what is happening in the United States – albeit to a lesser extent – where religious and political activism has led to widespread book bans. "
@smallcircles Interesting. The vibe I'm getting after reading the landing page is that this is a way you can coordinate volunteers to pool time together to work on stuff that they're all interested in. Is that an accurate read?
@smallcircles Neat is it more of a "lifestyle" community sort of thing?
personally I'm going to be experimenting with cooperstive governance models for distributed publishing this year so I'll add this to my todo list for figuring out the tradeoffs. :)
Gonna be taking a couple weeks off work though so I'll get back into it in october
@mauve @evan @bengo Ideally i think corporations would not be at the table at all. that doesnt seem realistic though. if we try to exclude them altogether they'll just lie their way in. At least with W3C you need a confirmed corporate email address to join, so others can check your profile to see who you are affiliated with.
@evan @mauve @bengo more widespread is great. but if Threads attracts enough users to become the dominant player in the Fediverse, they could start closing it off or changing it in favor of themselves and to the detriment of others. So i'd like to see a diverse array of small to medium sized orgs and companies or communities embracing AP instead. the involvement of large corporations makes me uneasy.
@smallcircles Neat! Is this cryptonomocs or consumer coop type stuff?
@helge right now I'm focused on making it easier for web publishers to use this stuff and with all our work being in the open for devs to peek at and reuse 🥰
My wip blog post about it: https://github.com/RangerMauve/blog.mauve.moe/pull/1
Tbh these two guides and peeking at my mastodon data got me all I needed. :P
https://paul.kinlan.me/adding-activity-pub-to-your-static-site/
https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2018/06/how-to-implement-a-basic-activitypub-server/
It was honestly trivial compared to some of the stuff out there 😅
@mariusor @helge Are you using your library for yourself and your own interests? That's the best way to do open source IMO. Whether a thing is "popular" or not is secondary. As long as it's useful to *someone* it's a win IMO. Unless you want to makey money off of it I guess, but that's a whole other ball game 😅
@steve @evan @djsf @bengo Like when they inevitably try to add ads to AP or whatever shit we can give them the finger and fork from any impl that's shitty enough to go with it. Prople thay want big social media corps can go ahead and use em, and existing AP communiyies can do fine without it.
I think it's mostly the monolith instances like .social that will cave to incorporate whatever facebook wants of them
Occult Enby that's making local-first software with peer to peer protocols, mesh networks, and the web.
Exploring what a local-first cyberspace might look like in my spare time.