Look, oplogs are great as a datamodel for mostly online systems that need full replication, but they aren't great for performance and being able to quickly show a user just the data they need in the moment right as they start the sync. Waiting for an entire sync is just not reasonable when your message volume gets high. This is why we need indexing at the protocol layer. Blogged about it here: https://blog.mauve.moe/posts/peer-to-peer-databases
The thing that inspired me was actually the operation of my #matrix homeserver that has *all* the bridges. The different protocols being their own services has been great. All the extra stuff and needing to run a server has kinda sucked. The matrix data model is also hard to build lightweight clients for which has also been hard for progress.
Mainly I'm working to make a sort of alernative to libpurple which uses domain sockets between bridges instead of having all that stuff in a single app. I'll be taking hits with this IPC protocol, but I think the reslience and ease of use cross language will be worth it.
At my organisation, Copilot for MS Teams transcription (or whatever it’s called) is now disabled org-wide because there was a scare based on the fact that Copilot “hallucinated” something that was not said at this meeting, which was then actioned by a non-attendee as a real point.
Thankfully, whatever this was, was caught before it was fulfilled/implemented by someone who does governance checks, but hahah it’s really darkly comic to think that we could have done something that nobody asked for and nobody wanted because Microsoft’s shitbot inserted it in a transcript
New: Florida and Texas are moving to block or end their use of license plate surveillance tech, like Flock, citing privacy concerns and police abuse. The backlash against Flock is growing and increasingly bipartisan.
Bypass for ad-blockers: https://web.archive.org/web/20260901150833/https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/01/florida-and-texas-move-to-block-flock-cameras-over-privacy-concerns/
I WILL NOT BE BULLIED 💎
I received a vicious reply today because I use AI. It wasn't a disagreement. Nor a criticism. It was a full-frontal personal attack! And I’ll admit it affected me more than I expected.
I USE AI MAINLY BECAUSE I'M PARALYSED.
Typing is physically difficult for me. I have the use of only one hand. So, tapping out a post or email with one finger is exhausting. Voice and AI help me turn my own thoughts into usable writing in a normal amount of time.
THAT SHOULD NOT REQUIRE A DEFENCE.
You can dislike AI. You can distrust it. You can argue about copyright concerns, energy and water use, labour, culture, or anything else that concerns you. I will listen to you and answer you.
But attacking people simply for using AI is not principled.
IT'S BULLYING.
And disabled people should not have to produce a medical justification every time they use a technology that makes their life easier.
AI is a tool. How it is used matters. Who gets harmed matters. Context matters. What does not help is turning “AI user” into a moral accusation and deciding that cruelty is suddenly acceptable.
I’m quite happy to discuss the technology with anyone.
HOWEVER, I WILL NOT BE BULLIED FOR USING IT.
I didn't need to do anything about the attack. Before I could even decide how to respond, both the post and the person disappeared from my notifications.
@3goodthings @DigitalCoup @meditation @economics_that_works @startrek
#AI #Accessibility #Disability #AssistiveTechnology #Fediverse #Bullying #PWD #Tool
Occult cyberpunk. Yap with me about decentralized systems, wearable computing, and biohacking.