@dumpsterqueer IMO we need more people off of social media and back into hanging out IRL. If the mainstream platforms died and we had some small niche spaces left for the weirdos then the world would be a better place.
will never understand why anyone would want the fedi to go "mainstream"; as though there's not already plenty of mainstream social networks for people who want to feel connected to everyone in the world
lean in to the weird little server vibes where you can chat shit and flirt with your friends imo; destroy the concept of "the fediverse" as a mappable monoculture and embrace how you can have fun just seeing a tiny 1% of posts from your cozy corner instead
#Oxford #recycling RedZone: turns out that the year plan we printed in April contained an error offsetting the cycle from the first week of August onwards. Council quietly corrected it online without telling us ... https://www.oxford.gov.uk/downloads/file/4098/recycling-and-waste-collection-guide-for-april-2026-to-march-2027 Will probably catch out others as well when coming back from hols and out of the habit of the two-week cycle.
@Unixbigot it'd be neat if there was a story where the plucky humans literally had no hope of winning becausw their intelligence gap is similar to humans/cats. Like sure they can scheme but a lot of it will be transparent and the feeder aliens would overwhelm them with force.
@tcikoritys TBH I don't have any specific projects lined up yet. Pretty much anything I could do in lisp I could do faster in any of the other languages I know :P
I'm thinking of following this article to make a logic engine just for the practice:
https://medium.com/@batuhanayrba/building-a-prolog-like-logic-engine-in-common-lisp-1995d6168565
Then probably some messing with ASTs and parsers?
Also see this person's setup with rlwrap which makes the REPL a bit nicer. https://snac.d34d.net/pkw/p/1786980640.595258
AI Musings
This week, I've been thinking a lot about the downstream effects of AI on access literacy in blindness spaces. I've seen at least three bespoke email clients show up now, built with accessibility in mind and, at least in large part, with AI. Which is great! If you can make the thing that works better for you, why wouldn't you? Bespoke fixes for inaccessible software obviously aren't new. Screen reader vendors still write scripts for applications that otherwise work terribly. As an example, the built-in set of JAWS scripts is a veritable who's who of business applications. We've been fixing software from the outside for decades. The difference, I think, is where the fix sits in the stack. A JAWS script makes Outlook usable. Numerous NVDA add-ons exist to enhance other productivity apps, too. Ideally, the company fixes the problem themselves. Despite the accessibility issues--and usually because of the fixes--people are still using the mainstream solution. But now it's becoming practical to just make a different email client or word processor. (Yes, I know blind-centric word processors aren't new.) This is where my spidey senses start niggling a little. A lot of being a competent blind computer user is knowing how to deal with software that sucks. Finding the weird workaround, knowing enough about how a screen reader works to poke at something another way, using deductive reasoning to figure out what button is what when the obvious route is broken. These aren't skills we *should* need, but they are skills that make one effective in school and professional life. Until fairly recently, scarcity and necessity more or less guaranteed we'd learn them. Nobody had the time or money to make a bespoke accessible version of every piece of software they encountered. Even when somebody wrote a script or add-on to make something better, we were generally still operating in the same software everyone else was using. So, what happens to a blind person 5-10 years away who's been handed purpose-built tools whenever something is annoying or inaccessible, then gets a corporate job and is dumped head-first into Outlook, PowerPoint, Excel, Google Workspace, and whatever random harebrained internal software dominates in that decade? 1/2
Without language to describe your experiences, it gets really hard to organize around them. The denial of our language is a powerful weapon, and has constant impacts on us.
#meme #anarchism #anarchyMeme #ableism #ableist #accessibility #anarchy
@pkw @mousebot @hajovonta That's awesome ty. Do you have any writeups on how you use it and how it fits in your workflow? Like, do you go repl-first when developing stuff?
@tcikoritys Right?! I tried to give SBCLs repl a shake but I couldn't figure out what the hype was about. Just moving around the cursor and the code was kind of tedious compared to other repls I've tried. 😅
@mousebot @hajovonta TY. I was hoping for more long form articles on built in REPLs like the on in SBCL rather than IDEs or editor extensions. I don't use any of those IDEs and don't plan on switching to them so it sadly doesn't apply.
@hajovonta Yeah! I'm aware. I was hoping folks had writeups of using something like the SBCL REPL for more advanced uses than the usual introduction to the basic features. TBH I might just make my own REPL and add whatever features I need at this point. 😅
@amoroso Yeah I've read some books with intros to it, I was really hoping for more advanced deep dives or war stories of how people have used it. I'll add this to my read queue though, ty!
Occult cyberpunk. Yap with me about decentralized systems, wearable computing, and biohacking.